Choose your managers wisely; they have cookies on the dark side

In my every day work I encounter numerous management styles, ranging from HR-managers doing operational management and vice versa, to managers thinking that “divide and conquer” was a phrase written by a manager and is applicable on groups of employees. I am not saying all managers are bad at there job, certainly not, I am saying that management is one of the professional areas that is relatively easy to get in to but extremely hard to perform well.

Somehow, in the Netherlands, it is fairly common that once a person becomes the best in his department (in operational sense), they get to lead the department.
Nobody has ever been able to explain that to me though; why does your best programmer/business analyst/etc. make a good manager?
The qualities that lead them to be the best in their field are mostly not the qualities that are required for a good manager.
Besides gaining a potentially bad manager you also lose your best operational person; sounds like a lose-lose situation to me.

An interesting note would be that a lot of the professionals that switch to a management position would rather keep doing the job they were doing before switching.
There are several reasons for people to switch from jobs they would actually like to do, and are good at, to something they perhaps like less. The following list is unordered and there are most probably research papers out there that cover this subject, giving an ordering (or more options)

  • A new challenge
    • Most people like to do something new from time to time, the problem is with switching to management; it’s usually quite hard to switch back.
    • This is actually a good motivation for people to switch to a management position, as long as they get the opportunity to switch back when they don’t like it or aren’t as capable enough to fulfill the new role.
  • Being able to do the job better then the current manager
    • A common story is that of people thinking their manager lacks capacity and they would be more suited for the job.
    • The motivation is not a bad motivation per se, but a lot of people quickly step into the same pitfalls as the manager they don’t deem competent.
  • The money
    • Managers earn more in the Netherlands then the best operational employee, I still haven’t figured out why.
    • When I hear this as the motivator, I usually steer the conversation to a contractual conversation regarding the current position the employee is in. I consider it a big no-no for people to switch purely for the money.
  • The status
    • Somehow people still think that being a manager gives you a better social standing or status over being an operational employee.
    • This, for me, is the absolute no-go reason for people to switch to a management position. The persons who have this as their “real reason” to switch usually have a tendency to control people top-down, with a fine ability to kill the motivation and spirit of a team for their own gains.
  • The motivation to help people
    • This is, again; for me, the real essence of being a manager. You put yourself on second place to the stakeholders (the company, the customer, the operational staff, etc.) interest.
    • The people with this motive usually have the potential to quickly grow in their role and usually become part of the (short) list of good managers.

But how do you get to the “real” motivation of people when they say they want a management position? In my experience quite easy; just ask them, continue the conversation, ask the question another way and try to uncover some personal trades which are also good indicators. What makes the person tick? But besides asking, which will not always give the true answer, assessments and different questioning techniques have proved useful for me in the past.

Okay, so you have selected your manager, a motivated person with great skills to match. He got a 5 day course on management, a goal and now it is day 1 in his new role.
The manager holds a meeting where he is reintroducing himself in his new role, explaining the plans, his take on them and allowing the group to ask questions.
After that they start reading up on all the documents that are available and important now, shaking hands with their new colleagues from other departments.
Then it’s day 2, a deadline within a week, and the manager hears something isn’t going to be done on time. Panic strikes the new manager, if he doesn’t solve this one his colleagues and his own managers most probably will think poorly of him (in his own mind that is).
He mobilizes all related personnel and tells them that they have to solve the problem by working harder and, although he hates it, they might have to do some overtime as well.
After a long weekend of overtime and telling people what to do the manager subdues the crisis and life continues.
Within a month, your new manager is the manager he always resented himself and is deemed “not fit for the job” by his former peers.

My advice would be; don’t ever let a new manager start without clear goals, boundaries and coaching. Every manager (and person in general) learns by making mistakes, but coach them, give them constructive feedback and give the manager clear goals and boundaries.
This is where most managers get stuck, they never get the support they need to grow and learn, just because the senior managers are “too busy” and they were deemed “good for the job”, so they should be able to do it themselves. A 5 days training isn’t enough to make someone a good manager

Is there a moral to this story?
I doubt there is one, but if there is it would at least involve the following things;

  • Be careful who you chose as a new manager
  • Get the real motivation of the person who wants a manager position clear
  • Use assessments to see if the potential manager has right personal traits for the job.
  • Give your managers clear objectives and boundaries.
  • Coach and give your managers guidance in their job, not just trainings.

And last but not least, try not to oversimplify everything to rational objects; managers are there to deal with people and they have the tendency to be complex.
Below is a small section from Mintzberg (“Strategy Safari”) which made me smile:

Five easy steps to destroying a rich culture

  • Step 1: Manage the bottom line (as if you make money by managing money)
  • Step 2: Make a plan for every action: no spontaneity please, no learning.
  • Step 3: Move managers around to be certain they never get to know anything but management well (and kick the boss upstairs – better to manage a portofolio then a real business)
  • Step 4: Always be objective, which means to treat people as objects (in particular, hire and fire employees the way you buy and sell machines – everything is a “portfolio”)
  • Step 5: Do everything in five easy steps

Comments (2)

  1. Mary - Reply

    March 23, 2008 at 7:48 pm

    Hi Barre,

    In reply to your blogpost i would gladly post a blog myself with the title:
    Manager or Leader (m/v), explaining the (consequences of the) difference between the two.

    But then my reply would be as elongated as yours and you would not be adviced / informed comprehensively. Because there is much to say about this. Therefor i would like to state:

    Managers do things the right way, leaders do the right things and good leaders do the right things right! 🙂

    It must be terrible to encounter them almost every day; these many managers whome belong to the group “fits the Peter Principle”. It shows because your blog is more like a extended complaint. But if you do meet them every day you are so right to share your gloomy (?) thoughts with us.
    As you mention, every person, be it manager or what ever ‘other’ employee, needs to know what is expected and can use some kind of mentoring. This advice, however, doesn’t help much on the matter at hand.

    For a large part managing can be teached / learned.
    Instead leaders emerge. You know why? They listen. They listen very carefully; they are passionate about the company they work for, love and respect the people they work with and have intrinsic discipline and great ambition. That is their motivation. Who needs an assesment when you know this? Look for the listeners, the lovers, the passionate and disciplined people.

    The book Stategy Safari is a comprehensive explanation of the 10 schools of strategic planning and the strategic planning processes. And guess the conclusion? The ‘configuration” school is the best. But wait....that’s Mintzberg own hypothesis. Right!

    Not adequately related to the subject you write about.

    Perhaps we can have an discussion on this topic some other time.

    Mary

  2. Veille techno S12 - Reply

    March 24, 2008 at 5:23 pm

    [...] Choose your managers wisely; they have cookies on the dark side [...]

Add a Comment