<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 SOA Pitfalls: #4 &#8211; Incorrectly applied Canonical Data Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xebia.com/2008/06/02/top-10-soa-pitfalls-4-incorrectly-applied-canonical-data-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xebia.com/2008/06/02/top-10-soa-pitfalls-4-incorrectly-applied-canonical-data-model/</link>
	<description>Software development done right!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.xebia.com/2008/06/02/top-10-soa-pitfalls-4-incorrectly-applied-canonical-data-model/#comment-109464</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xebia.com/?p=575#comment-109464</guid>
		<description>Some folks I&#039;m working with are pushing to use the CDM objects (jaxb generated I believe) as the entities to persist in our persistance layer. Is this out of scope for CDM? Should we be using seperate entity objects when persisting to the DB? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some folks I&#8217;m working with are pushing to use the CDM objects (jaxb generated I believe) as the entities to persist in our persistance layer. Is this out of scope for CDM? Should we be using seperate entity objects when persisting to the DB? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raju Bodapati</title>
		<link>http://blog.xebia.com/2008/06/02/top-10-soa-pitfalls-4-incorrectly-applied-canonical-data-model/#comment-93755</link>
		<dc:creator>Raju Bodapati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xebia.com/?p=575#comment-93755</guid>
		<description>Very well said.  

One good example for industry standard is the ACORD XML (refer www.acord.org.)  They defined generic insurance data standards.  Entities that are exchanged between two or many systems should be part of CDM.  The diagram is a little misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said.  </p>
<p>One good example for industry standard is the ACORD XML (refer <a href="http://www.acord.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.acord.org</a>.)  They defined generic insurance data standards.  Entities that are exchanged between two or many systems should be part of CDM.  The diagram is a little misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.xebia.com/2008/06/02/top-10-soa-pitfalls-4-incorrectly-applied-canonical-data-model/feed/ ) in 0.55603 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 9:44 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:44 pm UTC -->
