Comments on: Spring 2.5 – Heavily Auto-Wired http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/ Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:40:47 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Allen http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/comment-page-1/#comment-35013 Allen Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:56:01 +0000 http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/#comment-35013 Hi i want to use @Resource or @Autowire to make a prototype bean , how to do it ? thankyou Hi
i want to use @Resource or @Autowire to make a prototype bean , how to do it ?

thankyou

]]> By: Alef Arendsen http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/comment-page-1/#comment-26171 Alef Arendsen Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:04:48 +0000 http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/#comment-26171 [quote]I\’ll certainly will protest if somebody is going to use it.[/quote] ;-) That's how I know you! ;-) What about a tiny part of your application, such as the web layer, where (using the new @Controller support) it allows you to get almost Rails-like behavior with controller being automatically picked up? I agree that it's a pity that you will be losing the application's documentation--however Spring IDE will support rendering of graphs based on autowired beans in the (near) future. Still, this is tooling and the underlying config file does not express the relations explicitly anymore... cheers, Alef [quote]I\’ll certainly will protest if somebody is going to use it.[/quote]

;-) That’s how I know you! ;-)

What about a tiny part of your application, such as the web layer, where (using the new @Controller support) it allows you to get almost Rails-like behavior with controller being automatically picked up?

I agree that it’s a pity that you will be losing the application’s documentation–however Spring IDE will support rendering of graphs based on autowired beans in the (near) future. Still, this is tooling and the underlying config file does not express the relations explicitly anymore…

cheers,
Alef

]]> By: Peter Veentjer http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/comment-page-1/#comment-25956 Peter Veentjer Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:01:17 +0000 http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/#comment-25956 I agree. I think it should not be used on projects of considerable size and I\'ll certainly will protest if somebody is going to use it. Not writing code is not always better: some stuff should be made explicit. In a sense explicit wiring in the Spring application contexts documents how the bean is used. It is a shame if this executable documentation gets lost. I agree. I think it should not be used on projects of considerable size and I\’ll certainly will protest if somebody is going to use it.

Not writing code is not always better: some stuff should be made explicit. In a sense explicit wiring in the Spring application contexts documents how the bean is used. It is a shame if this executable documentation gets lost.

]]> By: Jan http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/comment-page-1/#comment-25097 Jan Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:28:35 +0000 http://blog.xebia.com/2007/11/22/328/#comment-25097 To me "Auto-Wiring" has always been too magical. In my view it can lead to hard to maintain software. To me “Auto-Wiring” has always been too magical. In my view it can lead to hard to maintain software.

]]>